Gripping Tales: Fair's Fair

Product Information

This is closer to the “vertical comparator” used in CVA unfair prejudice claims and is particularly interesting to analyse in circumstances where there is nothing to prohibit a Plan from departing from the statutory waterfall of priorities in an insolvent administration or liquidation (i. He happens across a large old house in which he finds a little girl, Lillipolly, sitting at a long dining table and eating a freshly-cooked feast, the type of which Jackson himself has never seen. With an engaging (and very creepy) story, illustrated in colour and black and white on every double page spread, this story is ideal for newly confident readers.

The book is quite short so you don't have to get annoyed because it is taking so long to find out about the end. Therefore this book would be a great resource for either a PSHE or Literacy lesson in either KS1 or 2.As a consultant obstetrician in a deprived area of North Wales, he’s in regular contact with health inequalities: they present at his antenatal clinics every week. Through this carefully framed wording, we can infer that Parliament’s intention was for the Court’s role in sanctioning Plans to go beyond simply ensuring that the procedural statutory prerequisites and voting thresholds have been satisfied. Eager to eat his pie and also keep warm, Jackson, encounters a huge ferocious black dog of whom he shares his meal with.

The commercial designer and illustrator James Gardner was the Chief Designer; with pre-fabrication expert D. So, for instance, in addition to contextualised admissions, institutions could put in place support programmes for less advantaged students to help those who have had uneven access to prior knowledge before their study.

In addition to contextualised admissions, this might include learners who need financial support and incentives to stay in education if they are to take advantage of the transformative potential of tertiary education. In the absence of any legislative guidance on what such a test looks like, the Court has drawn analogies from a variety of different concepts. Fair’s Fair’ features an unlikely hero, a “thin small and ugly” orphaned boy who lives on the city streets. You may be here because you’ve come across a book, or play, or article of mine and you want to know more. The book introduces Jackson as starving, hungry and dirty waiting to eat his hot, steamy pie he had earned.

I teach my children that regardless of the situation it's never ok to hit anyone; and if they do retaliate and hit back, they may well find themselves dealt the same punishment as the child who hit them in the first place. He’d like to see ‘Be fair’ enshrined as a BMA behaviour principle, for example, alongside ‘Be professional, accountable, kind, representative and respectful’. It seems apparent from these cases that fairness, whilst still considered and ruled upon by the Court, is perhaps scrutinised less in the absence of creditor opposition, coming back to the notion confirmed early on in Part 26A’s lifetime that “ properly informed creditors who have sufficient time to consider the proposal and voting at a fairly conducted meeting are very likely to be the best judges of their own commercial interests” (see Re Pizza Express Financing 2 Plc [2020] EWHC 3933 (Ch) at [17], which referred back to Lindley LJ’s guidance in Re English, Scottish and Australian Charter Bank (1893) 3 Ch 385). For example, if someone hits your child, they may feel that a fair response is to go right ahead and hit them back. This “ test of fairness” tends to manifest in one of two ways: (i) a prerequisite to sanction that the Court examines in all cases (the “ proactive approach”; see, for example, Re Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd [2020] EWHC 2376 (Ch), Re Gategroup Guarantee Ltd [2021] EWHC 775 (Ch) and Re Hong Kong Airlines Ltd); or (ii) a ground for challenge which provides a basis for additional Court scrutiny and activates the Court’s discretion to refuse sanction (the “ reactive approach”; see, for example, Re Houst Ltd [2022] EWHC 1941 (Ch), Re Nasmyth Group Ltd and Re The Great Annual Savings Co Ltd).For example, even if the conditions of cross-class cram down are met, the court may refuse to sanction a restructuring plan on the basis it is not just and equitable. This is another of Garfield’s rare excursions into writing a children’s book definitely written for children.

The second factor qualifies the first: the Court will be “ slow to differ” from the views of a given class in determining whether the Plan operates fairly against them, so long as that class was fairly represented and properly consulted. HMRC, having voted against the Plan, would have seen its preferential claim compromised to enable a distribution to those out-of-the-money creditors who would rank behind it in the relevant alternative. I would suggest talking to your child about various real life scenarios, and try to get them to acknowledge the difference between what's ‘fair' and what's ‘right'. The illustrations are also fantastic for reading at home, and seeing what description can be seen in the pictures to help enhance children’s collection of descriptive words. But it tends to give precedence to people in the greatest medical need (where greater need is a ‘relevant inequality).The report found that the four biggest challenges facing the Big Society were: the scepticism of some citizens, residents' fear about the changes, potential social divisions resulting from the reforms and the risk of increased inequality. This new 'to be fair' seems to me part of the way we are turning away from personal contact, allowing a form of privatisation of the public sphere.