Letters to a Law Student: A guide to studying law at university

Product Information

For example, suppose that the law provides that a person may file a bankruptcy only if his debts exceed the value of his assets. Therefore, books that strictly send advice to anyone on graduate schools or colleges are world-changing. The appropriate noises are coming out of his larynx, but his brain is not involved as it would be if he were choosing his words for himself. A speaker who uses that kind of phraseology has gone some distance towards turning himself into a machine.

There are some issues that all of us may have to talk about together, such as where we are going to go and when. then you are asking about the elements of the rule, and that is a question we are prepared to answer.

The difference between rolling the dice and legal analysis is the difference between prediction and detection, or the difference between what might happen in the future based upon things we cannot know, and what is likely to happen in the future based upon what we know about the past. A specialist in areas of the common law (obligations) he is also director of undergraduate studies and a law librarian, equipping him with the ideal background for guiding students through their legal studies. has a Secretary of State a right to see all a man’s private letters of correspondence, family concerns, trade and business? The only negative aspect if this book would be that some of its chapters are mainly directed towards UK law students which could be penalising for someone who would like to study somewhere else. Each class develops its own sense of competition; some become very supportive communities and others are schools of sharks.

One of the letters gives advice on how to interview well, another on the common traps to avoid in your application, and another on the LNAT (the compulsory admissions test for law at Oxford and a handful of other universities). Not only is our “normal” education system failing many but also, causing a sticky situation for so many young people that affects the rest of their lives. The law tends to be pretty boring when you view it from a great distance- it’s only when you get close up to the law and see it in all its glory that you can give yourself a chance of getting really interested in it.It is not our job, and we could not possibly anticipate the substantive knowledge or skills you will need during the next forty years (much of that law doesn’t even exist yet). About to become a law student myself, I held the book in my hand and I felt just how strongly I could relate to that image, nearing the end of a pathway of sixth form studies staring out into the expansive open ocean that would soon become my future in legal studies. If you participated in class discussions, it may have been by offering your opinion about a text or issue. I would strongly recommend this book to current students, as it raises issues which are not dealt with in other texts and has many sterling qualities. For me, I am set and stone on going to college and then law school; yet, despite my excitement, deep inside I am apprehensive and uneasy about the tests, grades, studying, passing, and constantly questioning myself if I am intelligent enough to conquer one of life’s most unique challenges.

Suppose further that your clients, the Stanleys, have assets that, at fair market value, exceed their debts. I can safely answer, there is none; and therefore it is too much for us without such authority to pronounce a practice legal, which would be subversive of all the comforts of society. If a statute requires four elements, you must convince the decision maker that all four elements are represented in the facts of this case to get relief under the rule. Let me now give you an example to make clearer the idea I am advancing here of seeing law as an ongoing conversation that is aimed at determining what sort of society we should live in.Because your professors are trying to hammer this process into your brain, and the importance of IRAC, and the concomitant value of predictability, it may seem that the first semester is painfully repetitive, even anti-intellectual.

For what it’s worth, my quick answer would be: People should do a law degree because studying law is interesting, important, and educational. Sure, I may be scared and have much more areas to learn, but I can at least say that I was far from how most high school students are. This book covers a range of topics such as why choose a law degree, preparing to study Law, studying law, writing like a lawyer and the next steps after one's law degree. The requirement that judges not give effect to their own personal views as to what sort of society we should live in, but rather the emerging consensus among law-makers on this issue is a salutary one – however frustrating a particular judge (for example, one who believes strongly in the acceptability of euthanasia) might find it. The first of the Secret Barrister books neatly depicts how the Law in the UK is broken, highlighting issues within the Magistrate’s Court such as the lack of diversity on the Bench and its implications, to the problem with a deflating legal aid budget and the consequences on people's access to justice.

I am best known as a teacher and scholar of the Uniform Commercial Code; I took that class pass-fail. You are not primarily here to learn the substance of the law for future use; you are learning the skills of analysis and self-instruction for future use.