Lord Edgware Dies (Poirot)

Product Information

The Duke of Merton from the original novel was very cold and supercilious toward Poirot. In this adaptation he is a friendly Nice Guy who expresses appreciation for Poirot's help, and ultimately gives him a substantial monetary reward in gratitude for saving him from unknowingly marrying a murderess.

Subverted with Jane Wilkinson, who in the book is described as a blatantly selfish individual who shamelessly brags about wanting to kill her husband so that she can marry another man, and refuses to take the hint when Poirot tries to refuse her commission to "get rid" of her husband. In this adaptation, she is initially portrayed as a sympathetic victim who is forced to silently endure her husband's cruelty, and her asking for Poirot's help comes across more like a desperate plea than a callous demand. But all this is revealed to be an act after she is exposed as the killer, and her deliberate gloating of her final speech comes across as meaner-spirited than the childish amorality she exhibited in her final letter to Poirot in the original book. Lord Edgware Dies is a work of detective fiction by British writer Agatha Christie, published in the UK by the Collins Crime Club in September 1933 [1] and in the US by Dodd, Mead and Company later in the same year under the title of Thirteen at Dinner. [2] [3] Before its book publication, the novel was serialised in six issues (March–August 1933) of The American Magazine as 13 For Dinner. Foreshadowing: The episode opens with a theater production in which Jane Wilkinson is playing Lady Macbeth.

Femme Fatale: Jane Wilkinson, a trait that is played up even more here by suggesting that Poirot is developing feelings for her. During the dénouement she gloats about being able to wrap Poirot around her finger with her "power over men", and her response to Poirot accusing her is to light up a fancy cigarette and say "Did I?" with a smirk. Hercule Poirot is hired by Lady Edgware an American actress who wants him to arrange a divorce from her aristocratic husband. In fact it turns out that Lord Edgware has already agreed to a divorce, only for him to be murdered the same night. Which is a better title, in your opinion: Lord Edgware Dies or “Thirteen at Dinner”? It depends, you might say. When does Lord Edgware Die? Is it a spoiler? And what is the significance of the number thirteen, at dinner? I read Christie, study her actually for her inventiveness in playing a game that is central to the future of narrative. It is truly important.

Poirot Facsimile Edition (Facsimile of 1933 UK first edition), 5 February 2007, Hardcover, 256 pp; ISBN 0-00-724022-8 While Jane Wilkinson is at a dinner party that she only left for a few minutes to take a phone call. Lord Edgware is murdered. There are a lot of suspects, his daughter from his first marriage disliked him. His penniless nephew stands to inherit the title. a b "An American Tribute to Agatha Christie". The Classic Years 1930-1934. May 2007 . Retrieved 16 June 2015. Jane Wilkinson appears to be a sweet and charming woman, but upon being unmasked reveals herself to be a smug Femme Fatale who enjoys manipulating people. Jane Wilkinson in the novel, on the other hand, was openly self-centered, which is revealed in the end to be Not an Act; she really was that selfish, and she committed three murders because she felt she was in her right to do so.Lord Edgware, an unpopular aristocrat, is murdered in his home. And who is the initial suspect? His wife, as she wanted to divorce him and remarry. But is she really the culprit? Isn’t there any other who would have wanted him dead, like his nephew, the next in line to the title, who is in the midst of financial crisis? Question after question rises as Christie takes us through the murder mystery where Poirot is dealing with a clever and calculating murderer. However, the murderer finally succumbs to Poirot's brilliant analytical and deductive powers, but not without mistakes from the part of the great detective. While Hercule Poirot and Captain Arthur Hastings are out one day, they are approached by none of their than the famous American actress, Jane Wilkinson. While she expects them to be in awe, she admits that she needs help trying to ‘get rid of’ her husband, Lord Edgware. Wilkinson wants a divorce, hoping to marry someone who can love and respect her without leaving her feeling controlled. Baffled and yet not interesting in getting in the middle of a marital spat, Poirot declines and continues on his way. He and Hastings are left to discuss the gall of Americans and their forward nature. However, soon things will take on a new urgency when Lord Edgware turns up murdered. I did have one complaint about the delivery – although I am not sure if it is my fault for assuming the conventions apply in all situations, or if it was the episode's fault for defying the norm. At one point we hear from a witness that she saw Lady Edgware, and yet we see that she had a restricted view (as do we) so it leaves at least the doubt, even though we are 100% told that it was her. However, the key scene is the dinner party, where an impersonator goes instead – but yet in this scene as described, we see clearly that it is Lady Edgware (as played by Helen Grace). This is a bit cruel on the viewer because it does provide us with her alibi in a way we cannot question. Again, maybe my fault for taking it at its word, but still I would have liked some of the candle-lit doubt that we are told existed in reality.