King Lear In Plain and Simple English: A Modern Translation and the Original Version (Classic Retold: Bookcaps Study Guides)

Product Information

Goneril and Regan turned away. ‘Sister,’ said Goneril. I need to talk to you about something that concerns us both. I think our father intends to leave tonight.’

I have always thought that the King prefers the Duke of Albany to the Duke of Cornwall,’ Kent was saying. It’s his own fault,’ said Goneril. ‘He’s upset himself and has to take the consequences of such folly.’ Cordelia watched with concern. What was she going to say when her turn came? Just love and be silent was all she could do. Regan, I think you are,’ said Lear. ‘I have good reason for thinking so. If you weren’t glad I would separate myself from your mother’s grave because it would be holding an adulteress.’ Meanwhile, the Earl of Gloucester’s illegitimate son Edmund turns Gloucester against his legitimate son, Edgar. Gloucester, appalled at the daughters’ treatment of Lear, gets news that a French army is coming to help Lear. Edmund betrays Gloucester to Regan and her husband, Cornwall, who puts out Gloucester’s eyes and makes Edmund the Earl of Gloucester.

The Folger Shakespeare

made you the guardians of my kingdom, and my trustees, but with the condition that I should keep a following of such a number. What? Do I have to come to you with twenty-five? Regan, is that what you said?’ Besides the subplot involving the Earl of Gloucester and his sons, the principal innovation Shakespeare made to this story was the death of Cordelia and Lear at the end; in the account by Geoffrey of Monmouth, Cordelia restores Lear to the throne, and succeeds him as ruler after his death. During the 17th century, Shakespeare's tragic ending was much criticised and alternative versions were written by Nahum Tate, in which the leading characters survived and Edgar and Cordelia were married (despite the fact that Cordelia was previously betrothed to the King of France). As Harold Bloom states: "Tate's version held the stage for almost 150 years, until Edmund Kean reinstated the play's tragic ending in 1823." [14]

Lear raised his hand and held it above the map. Goneril went closer to the table. ‘All of these lands, all the way from this line to that,’ he said, moving his hand over the map, ‘with its shady forests, fertile fields, all its rivers and wide meadows, we make you lady of. This is your and Albany’s descendents’ forever.’ He smiled as she kissed him and returned to her seat. He beamed at Regan. ‘What does our second daughter, our dearest Regan, wife of Cornwall, say? Speak.’ You concentrate on pleasing your husband, who has taken you in as a beggar,’ said Goneril. ‘You have been disobedient and fully deserve what’s happened to you.’ Alternatively, an analysis based on Adlerian theory suggests that the King's contest among his daughters in Act I has more to do with his control over the unmarried Cordelia. [40] This theory indicates that the King's "dethronement" [41] might have led him to seek control that he lost after he divided his land.

Essays and resources from The Folger Shakespeare

Right noble Burgundy,’ replied Lear, ‘when she was dear to us we considered her valuable, but now her price has fallen. Sir, there she stands. If anything about that seemingly unremarkable object, or all of it, together with our displeasure, appeals to your Grace, she’s there, and she is yours.’ There is no direct evidence to indicate when King Lear was written or first performed. It is thought to have been composed sometime between 1603 and 1606. A Stationers' Register entry notes a performance before James I on 26 December 1606. The 1603 date originates from words in Edgar's speeches which may derive from Samuel Harsnett's Declaration of Egregious Popish Impostures (1603). [16] A significant issue in the dating of the play is the relationship of King Lear to the play titled The True Chronicle History of the Life and Death of King Leir and his Three Daughters, which was published for the first time after its entry in the Stationers' Register of 8 May 1605. This play had a significant effect on Shakespeare, and his close study of it suggests that he was using a printed copy, which suggests a composition date of 1605–06. [17] Conversely, Frank Kermode, in the Riverside Shakespeare, considers the publication of Leir to have been a response to performances of Shakespeare's already-written play; noting a sonnet by William Strachey that may have verbal resemblances with Lear, Kermode concludes that "1604–05 seems the best compromise". [18]